Size for the workload
Assess models, context lengths, concurrency and latency targets. Benchmark representative workloads before committing to a GPU configuration.
For AI and platform teams deciding how much GPU capacity to buy or deploy. We benchmark your models against expected demand, then design the GPUs, storage, networking and inference services around your latency and budget requirements.
Assess models, context lengths, concurrency and latency targets. Benchmark representative workloads before committing to a GPU configuration.
Align accelerators with storage throughput, networking, drivers, scheduling and the model-serving layer. Avoid treating GPU capacity as an isolated purchase.
Plan workload isolation, resource quotas, monitoring and expansion. Track utilisation and inference performance to inform capacity decisions.
AI infrastructure includes accelerators, host systems, storage, networking and the model-serving software. The right design depends on the workload: interactive inference, batch processing and training have different capacity and operational needs.
A benchmark is the best starting point when a team knows its models but not the capacity it should buy. It is also useful when a prototype is slow, concurrency is unpredictable or a private inference service needs to support real staff workloads.
We define representative prompts, output sizes, concurrency and latency targets, then evaluate candidate configurations. The architecture covers model loading, storage throughput, scheduling, quotas, monitoring and expansion. Where Kubernetes is appropriate, GPU support and workload isolation are tested with the actual runtime.
Record answer quality alongside first-response latency, completion time, throughput and memory use. Include sustained load and failure conditions. Compare cost per accepted task rather than hardware specifications or token throughput alone.
Sizing cannot be guaranteed from employee count or model parameter count. Quantisation and runtime changes affect both quality and capacity. Dedicated hardware, shared capacity and managed endpoints are compared against the actual deployment constraints.
Understand when adapting a model still makes sense and how to compare training costs with prompting and retrieval.
Private AI & RAG · 3 MINCompare managed foundation-model applications with custom model development, then plan data, evaluation and regional requirements.
Private AI & RAG · 3 MINPlan inference capacity using model memory, context length, concurrency, latency and real workload benchmarks.
Not always. Model size, expected demand, data constraints and budget determine whether dedicated, shared or smaller on-premises capacity is appropriate.
We can design inference services inside your approved environment. Model availability, licensing and hardware compatibility are validated during discovery.